Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.7 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.7 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
800f82
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
291.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
13.76k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
23.03k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
5.12k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
15.23k (x1.26)
TOTAL
100.11k
57.13k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-13400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
83.23k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
161.06k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
40.52k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
6.73k (x0.18)
TOTAL
497.83k
291.53k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i5-13400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
4485 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4