Core i5-13400 vs i9-13900K
Description
Both models i5-13400 and i9-13900K are based on Raptor Lake architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.5 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.5 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/16
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
1763.08k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
58.6k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
33.29k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
17.77k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
19.49k (x1.61)
TOTAL
100.11k
129.15k (x1.29)
Multithread
i5-13400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
804.04k (x3.52)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
613.45k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
311.08k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
34.5k (x0.9)
TOTAL
497.83k
1763.08k (x3.54)
Performance/W
i5-13400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4