Core i5-13400 vs i9-13900HX
Description
Both models i5-13400 and i9-13900HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
10/16
24/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
1160.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
53.69k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
28.76k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
14.93k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
15.47k (x1.28)
TOTAL
100.11k
112.85k (x1.13)
Multithread
i5-13400
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
526.44k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
420.48k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
196.13k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
17.68k (x0.46)
TOTAL
497.83k
1160.72k (x2.33)
Performance/W
i5-13400
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
21104 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4