| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i7-13700T


Description
Both models i5-13400 and i7-13700T are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.9 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/16
16/24
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
46.53k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
28.48k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
15.08k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
17.07k (x1.41)
TOTAL
100.11k
107.15k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-13400

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
443.98k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
343.34k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
147.61k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
16.36k (x0.43)
TOTAL
497.83k
951.3k (x1.91)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4