| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i5-13600K


Description
Both models i5-13400 and i5-13600K are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 2.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/16
14/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
115.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
1023.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
54.36k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
29.93k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
15.39k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
15.52k (x1.28)
TOTAL
100.11k
115.19k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-13400

i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
457.21k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
360.82k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
172.64k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
32.91k (x0.86)
TOTAL
497.83k
1023.59k (x2.06)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
3658 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
2887 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
8189 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
10658 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
3018 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3042 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
22587 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4