| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i3-13100F


Description
Both models i5-13400 and i3-13100F are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
b06f5
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
47.14k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
25.77k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
13.25k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
14.77k (x1.22)
TOTAL
100.11k
100.94k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-13400

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
168.51k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
142.8k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
63.57k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
15.34k (x0.4)
TOTAL
497.83k
390.23k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4