| | | | | | |

Core i5-13400 vs i9-11900KB


Description
The i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-13400 gets a score of 497.8 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f2
806d1
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
10/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x2048+4x4096 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.11k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.83k points
537.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-13400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
47.01k
24.09k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.73k
19.54k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.28k
8.48k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
11.68k (x0.97)
TOTAL
100.11k
63.79k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-13400

i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
228.2k
220.79k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
160.28k
225.98k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71.12k
79.1k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.23k
11.32k (x0.3)
TOTAL
497.83k
537.18k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i5-13400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3511 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2466 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1094 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
588 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
7659 points/W
8264 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-13400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
10219 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5811 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3103 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2630 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
21763 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4