| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i9-10900X


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
50657
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
58 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
25.97k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
22.37k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
5.3k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
8.63k (x0.58)
TOTAL
100.94k
62.28k (x0.62)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
281.98k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
259.01k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
64.87k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
26.5k (x1.73)
TOTAL
390.23k
632.35k (x1.62)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4