| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i7-10870H


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a0652
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
30.38k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
27.95k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
6.51k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
14.37k (x0.97)
TOTAL
100.94k
79.2k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
216.18k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
210.82k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
51.57k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
8.47k (x0.55)
TOTAL
390.23k
487.05k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4