Core i3-13100F vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a0653
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
22k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
19.98k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
4.57k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
11.31k (x0.77)
TOTAL
100.94k
57.85k (x0.57)
Multithread
i3-13100F
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
136.69k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
135.25k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
32.76k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
2.48k (x0.16)
TOTAL
390.23k
307.18k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4