Core i3-13100F vs i5-10400
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a0653
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
27.46k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
24.28k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
5.65k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
11.92k (x0.81)
TOTAL
100.94k
69.31k (x0.69)
Multithread
i3-13100F
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
165.5k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
156.32k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
39.88k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
5.96k (x0.39)
TOTAL
390.23k
367.65k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4