Core i3-13100F vs i3-10105
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a0653
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
253.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
28.9k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.85k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
5.88k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
8.29k (x0.56)
TOTAL
100.94k
68.92k (x0.68)
Multithread
i3-13100F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
111.69k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
110.23k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
28.45k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
3.56k (x0.23)
TOTAL
390.23k
253.93k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4