Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
23.29k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.89k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
11.75k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
24.83k (x1.68)
TOTAL
100.94k
85.76k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-13100F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
138.16k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
192.12k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
80.84k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
9.93k (x0.65)
TOTAL
390.23k
421.05k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4