| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 7840HS


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.6 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
622.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
31.57k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.2k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
12.42k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
21.93k (x1.48)
TOTAL
100.94k
91.11k (x0.9)

Multithread

i3-13100F

7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
265.26k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
226.13k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
114.46k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
16.49k (x1.08)
TOTAL
390.23k
622.34k (x1.59)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
17781 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4