| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a40f41
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Rembrandt
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
21.04k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
22.41k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
10.21k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
24.27k (x1.64)
TOTAL
100.94k
77.93k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-13100F

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
158.65k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
215.86k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
89.45k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
14.77k (x0.96)
TOTAL
390.23k
478.73k (x1.23)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4