Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
58 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
410.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
15.02k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
24.26k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
5.53k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
16.26k (x1.1)
TOTAL
100.94k
61.07k (x0.6)
Multithread
i3-13100F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
122.92k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
220.32k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
59.78k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
7.44k (x0.49)
TOTAL
390.23k
410.47k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
4321 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4