Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 5 5600X
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a20f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
435.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
23.28k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.58k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
11.72k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
25.45k (x1.72)
TOTAL
100.94k
86.03k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-13100F
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
135.28k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
180.56k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
80.27k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
38.94k (x2.54)
TOTAL
390.23k
435.05k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
6693 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4