Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.5 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.5 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
14.34k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
17.67k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
6.41k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
14.95k (x1.01)
TOTAL
100.94k
53.37k (x0.53)
Multithread
i3-13100F
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
83.58k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
119.22k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
48.56k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
3.83k (x0.25)
TOTAL
390.23k
255.19k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4