Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
13.67k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
22.28k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
4.99k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
15.22k (x1.03)
TOTAL
100.94k
56.16k (x0.56)
Multithread
i3-13100F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
81.03k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
145.84k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
39.14k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
6.79k (x0.44)
TOTAL
390.23k
272.8k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4