| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i7-13700HX


Description
Both models i3-13100F and i7-13700HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2.7 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/24
TDP
58 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
1070.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
48.57k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
28.78k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
15.6k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
16.46k (x1.11)
TOTAL
100.94k
109.41k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
486.01k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
386.1k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
173.21k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
25.08k (x1.64)
TOTAL
390.23k
1070.39k (x2.74)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4