| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i5-13400


Description
Both models i3-13100F and i5-13400 are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
b06f2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/16
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
47.01k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
26.73k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
14.28k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
12.1k (x0.82)
TOTAL
100.94k
100.11k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
228.2k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
160.28k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
71.12k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
38.23k (x2.49)
TOTAL
390.23k
497.83k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4