| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i9-12900K


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-12900K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 2.9 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Alder Lake
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/24
TDP
58 W
241 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
109.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
1131.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
47.92k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
30.1k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
15.65k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
15.38k (x1.04)
TOTAL
100.94k
109.05k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
502.11k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
414.67k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
192.52k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
22.3k (x1.45)
TOTAL
390.23k
1131.59k (x2.9)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
2083 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
1721 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
799 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
4695 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
9216 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
2957 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
20971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4