| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i5-12600K


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-12600K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-12600K gets 764.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12600K is 2 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
111.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
764.68k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
52.6k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
27.28k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
14.86k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
16.4k (x1.11)
TOTAL
100.94k
111.14k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
356.58k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
263.15k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
126.87k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
18.08k (x1.18)
TOTAL
390.23k
764.68k (x1.96)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
5486 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
4048 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
11764 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
10735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3346 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
22682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4