| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i5-12400


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
90672
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
544.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
48.08k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.6k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
14.02k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
14.81k (x1)
TOTAL
100.94k
102.51k (x1.02)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
230.14k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
198.07k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
94.78k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
21.64k (x1.41)
TOTAL
390.23k
544.64k (x1.4)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
8379 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4