| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i3-12100T


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
90675
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
58 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
330.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
43.24k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
23.76k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
12.67k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
13.88k (x0.94)
TOTAL
100.94k
93.54k (x0.93)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
150.28k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
126.29k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
45.32k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
8.73k (x0.57)
TOTAL
390.23k
330.62k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4