| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
806c2
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
58 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
239.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
30.89k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.57k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
10.64k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
15.66k (x1.06)
TOTAL
100.94k
82.77k (x0.82)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
96.34k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
95.75k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
32.29k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
15.2k (x0.99)
TOTAL
390.23k
239.58k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4