| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i5-11400


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
a0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
489.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
31.23k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.88k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
10.83k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
18.17k (x1.23)
TOTAL
100.94k
86.11k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
213.85k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
195.51k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
72.06k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
7.89k (x0.51)
TOTAL
390.23k
489.31k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
7528 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4