| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 7730U


Description
The i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7730U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900K gets a score of 1763.1 k points while the 7730U gets 345.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.1 times faster than the 7730U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
FP6
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
129.15k points
60.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
1763.08k points
345.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900K
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.6k
13.41k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
33.29k
19.44k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
8.41k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.49k
18.92k (x0.97)
TOTAL
129.15k
60.18k (x0.47)

Multithread

i9-13900K

7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
804.04k
108.82k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
613.45k
162.53k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
311.08k
69.08k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.5k
4.98k (x0.14)
TOTAL
1763.08k
345.4k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i9-13900K
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/W
7254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4908 points/W
10835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2489 points/W
4605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
276 points/W
332 points/W
TOTAL
14105 points/W
23027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900K
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
10104 points/GHz
2979 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
4319 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3064 points/GHz
1869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3360 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
22268 points/GHz
13372 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4