Core i9-13900HX vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 885.4 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3.5 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 885.4 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3.5 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
110.99k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
885.37k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
53.97k
14.34k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
28.92k
17.67k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
6.41k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.25k
14.95k (x0.98)
TOTAL
110.99k
53.37k (x0.48)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
374.2k
83.58k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
331.24k
119.22k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164.06k
48.56k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.87k
3.83k (x0.24)
TOTAL
885.37k
255.19k (x0.29)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6804 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6023 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2983 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
289 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
16098 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
9994 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2380 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2825 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
20553 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4