| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 885.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Matisse
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
110.99k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
885.37k points
348.35k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.5k
15.38k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
29.03k
21.94k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.57k
7.97k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.71k
24.76k (x1.68)
TOTAL
83.8k
70.05k (x0.84)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
196.13k
96.91k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
222.91k
135.12k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.21k
70.39k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.26k
56.43k (x2.33)
TOTAL
572.52k
358.85k (x0.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
53.97k
16.04k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
28.92k
24.47k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
8.38k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.25k
21.66k (x1.42)
TOTAL
110.99k
70.55k (x0.64)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
374.2k
113.63k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
331.24k
143.55k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164.06k
63.84k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.87k
27.34k (x1.72)
TOTAL
885.37k
348.35k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6804 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6023 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2983 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
289 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
16098 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9994 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2380 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2825 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
20553 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4