| | | | | | |

Core i9-13900HX vs i3-13100F


Description
Both models i9-13900HX and i3-13100F are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 885.4 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b06f5
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
24/32
4/8
TDP
55 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
110.99k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
885.37k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
53.97k
47.14k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
28.92k
25.77k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
13.25k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.25k
14.77k (x0.97)
TOTAL
110.99k
100.94k (x0.91)

Multithread

i9-13900HX

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
374.2k
168.51k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
331.24k
142.8k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164.06k
63.57k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.87k
15.34k (x0.97)
TOTAL
885.37k
390.23k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i9-13900HX
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6804 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6023 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2983 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
289 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
16098 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
9994 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2380 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2825 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
20553 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4