Core i5-1335U vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06a3
50654
Core
Raptor Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
92.46k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
282.25k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1335U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
37.94k
18.78k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
16.25k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.86k
3.99k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
6.8k (x0.47)
TOTAL
92.46k
45.82k (x0.5)
Multithread
i5-1335U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
125.7k
133.55k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
93.63k
108.43k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.18k
30.02k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.75k
9.48k (x0.57)
TOTAL
282.25k
281.48k (x1)
Performance/W
i5-1335U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8380 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6242 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3079 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
18817 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1335U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8248 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5692 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3013 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3147 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
20100 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4