| | | | | | |

Core i5-1335U vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06a3
306f2
Core
Raptor Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
92.46k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
282.25k points
343.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1335U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
37.94k
20.99k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
11.9k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.86k
4.72k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
3.75k (x0.26)
TOTAL
92.46k
41.36k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-1335U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
125.7k
172.62k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
93.63k
110.03k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.18k
44.06k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.75k
16.93k (x1.01)
TOTAL
282.25k
343.64k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i5-1335U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8380 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6242 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3079 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
18817 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1335U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8248 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5692 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3013 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3147 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
20100 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4