| | | | | | |

Core i5-1335U vs i7-10750H


Description
The i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the i7-10750H gets 345.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06a3
a0652
Core
Raptor Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
92.46k points
74.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
282.25k points
345.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1335U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.94k
28.66k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
26.2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.86k
6.14k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
13.59k (x0.94)
TOTAL
92.46k
74.6k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-1335U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
125.7k
152.33k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
93.63k
150.28k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.18k
36.1k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.75k
7.02k (x0.42)
TOTAL
282.25k
345.73k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i5-1335U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8380 points/W
3385 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6242 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3079 points/W
802 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/W
156 points/W
TOTAL
18817 points/W
7683 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1335U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8248 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5692 points/GHz
5240 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3013 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3147 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
TOTAL
20100 points/GHz
14919 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4