| | | | | | |

Core i5-1335U vs Ryzen 7 7840HS


Description
The i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7840HS is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06a3
a70f41
Core
Raptor Lake-U
Phoenix
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
92.46k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
282.25k points
622.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1335U
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
37.94k
31.57k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
25.2k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.86k
12.42k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
21.93k (x1.51)
TOTAL
92.46k
91.11k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-1335U

7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
125.7k
265.26k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
93.63k
226.13k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.18k
114.46k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.75k
16.49k (x0.98)
TOTAL
282.25k
622.34k (x2.2)

Performance/W
i5-1335U
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8380 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6242 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3079 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
18817 points/W
17781 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1335U
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8248 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5692 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3013 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3147 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
20100 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4