Core i5-1335U vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06a3
800f82
Core
Raptor Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
92.46k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
282.25k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1335U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.94k
15.34k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
25.75k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.86k
5.79k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
17.95k (x1.24)
TOTAL
92.46k
64.83k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-1335U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
125.7k
123.07k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
93.63k
239.3k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.18k
60.6k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.75k
8.18k (x0.49)
TOTAL
282.25k
431.14k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i5-1335U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8380 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6242 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3079 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
18817 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1335U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8248 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5692 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3013 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3147 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
20100 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4