| | | | | | |

Core i5-1335U vs i3-13100F


Description
Both models i5-1335U and i3-13100F are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1335U gets a score of 282.2 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06a3
b06f5
Core
Raptor Lake-U
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
92.46k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
282.25k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1335U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.94k
47.14k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
25.77k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.86k
13.25k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
14.77k (x1.02)
TOTAL
92.46k
100.94k (x1.09)

Multithread

i5-1335U

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
125.7k
168.51k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
93.63k
142.8k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.18k
63.57k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.75k
15.34k (x0.92)
TOTAL
282.25k
390.23k (x1.38)

Performance/W
i5-1335U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
8380 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6242 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3079 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1117 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
18817 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1335U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
8248 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5692 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3013 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3147 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
20100 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4