| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Xeon E5-2690 v3


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/24
12/24
TDP
125 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
1016.36k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
20.96k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
11.74k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
4.61k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
3.4k (x0.19)
TOTAL
120.97k
40.71k (x0.34)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
531.68k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
342.28k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
133.22k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
9.19k (x0.37)
TOTAL
1219.33k
1016.36k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
7529 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4