| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 491 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.5 times faster than the E5-1660 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
406f1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/24
8/16
TDP
125 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
November 2021
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
28.96k
12.41k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
17.23k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.94k
4.89k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.14k
3.07k (x0.18)
TOTAL
93.05k
37.6k (x0.4)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
166.25k
102.11k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
172.03k
156.5k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.95k
42.08k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
55.78k
19.8k (x0.35)
TOTAL
491.01k
320.49k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1330 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1376 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
776 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
3928 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5568 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5770 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3258 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3297 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
17894 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4