| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7950X3D is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1687.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.4 times faster than the i9-12900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a60f12
Core
Alder Lake-S
Raphael
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
16/24
16/32
TDP
125 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
131072 kB
Date
November 2021
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
122.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
1687.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
41.61k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
31.34k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
16.95k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
33.08k (x1.86)
TOTAL
120.97k
122.98k (x1.02)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
647k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
533.47k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
279.07k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
228.31k (x9.16)
TOTAL
1219.33k
1687.86k (x1.38)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
5392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
4446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
2326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
1903 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
14065 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
7300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5499 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
2973 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
5803 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
21575 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4