| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 5950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a20f12
Core
Alder Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
16/32
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
November 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
1060.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
19.88k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
25.26k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
10.77k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
23.59k (x1.33)
TOTAL
120.97k
79.51k (x0.66)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
349.53k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
470.67k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
207.28k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
33.13k (x1.33)
TOTAL
1219.33k
1060.62k (x0.87)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
10101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4