| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 5500


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3.3 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
373.05k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
28.96k
15.32k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
22.98k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.94k
9.3k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.14k
21.19k (x1.24)
TOTAL
93.05k
68.8k (x0.74)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
166.25k
80.25k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
172.03k
163.59k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.95k
72.83k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
55.78k
7.34k (x0.13)
TOTAL
491.01k
324.01k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
22.09k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
24.59k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
10.94k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
22.89k (x1.29)
TOTAL
120.97k
80.52k (x0.67)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
124.44k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
167.06k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
74.34k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
7.2k (x0.29)
TOTAL
1219.33k
373.05k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
5739 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4