| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
32768 kB
Date
November 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
348.35k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.96k
15.04k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
20.95k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.94k
8.57k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.14k
21.71k (x1.27)
TOTAL
93.05k
66.27k (x0.71)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
166.25k
94.36k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
172.03k
141.73k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.95k
69.38k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
55.78k
32.72k (x0.59)
TOTAL
491.01k
338.19k (x0.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
16.04k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
24.47k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
8.38k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
21.66k (x1.22)
TOTAL
120.97k
70.55k (x0.58)

Multithread

i9-12900KF

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
113.63k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
143.55k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
63.84k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
27.34k (x1.1)
TOTAL
1219.33k
348.35k (x0.29)

Performance/W
i9-12900KF
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4