Core i9-12900KF vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900KF gets a score of 1219.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
120.97k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
1219.33k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900KF
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
57.05k
14.08k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
29.66k
22.56k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.48k
5.19k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.78k
16.71k (x0.94)
TOTAL
120.97k
58.53k (x0.48)
Multithread
i9-12900KF
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
546.04k
86.62k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
437.01k
168.1k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211.36k
43.51k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.92k
5.16k (x0.21)
TOTAL
1219.33k
303.4k (x0.25)
Performance/W
i9-12900KF
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4368 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3496 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1691 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
199 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
9755 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-12900KF
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
10972 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5704 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3170 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3419 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
23264 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4