| | | | | | |

Core i9-12900K vs Xeon E5-2690 v3


Description
The i9-12900K is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-12900K gets a score of 1131.6 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
306f2
Core
Alder Lake
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/24
12/24
TDP
241 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+8x2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
109.05k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
1131.59k points
1016.36k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-12900K
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
47.92k
20.96k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
30.1k
11.74k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.65k
4.61k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.38k
3.4k (x0.22)
TOTAL
109.05k
40.71k (x0.37)

Multithread

i9-12900K

E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
502.11k
531.68k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
414.67k
342.28k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
192.52k
133.22k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.3k
9.19k (x0.41)
TOTAL
1131.59k
1016.36k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i9-12900K
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2083 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1721 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
799 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
4695 points/W
7529 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-12900K
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9216 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5789 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3009 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2957 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
20971 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4