| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-P
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
28 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
13.1k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
11.91k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
4.83k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
3.83k (x0.29)
TOTAL
73.92k
33.68k (x0.46)

Multithread

i7-1280P

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
105.42k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
109.99k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
44.56k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
17.7k (x1.13)
TOTAL
419.25k
277.66k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
20.99k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
11.9k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
4.72k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
3.75k (x0.29)
TOTAL
91.45k
41.36k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-1280P

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
172.62k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
110.03k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
44.06k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
16.93k (x1.05)
TOTAL
468.3k
343.64k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4