| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs Xeon E5-2660 v2


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 419.3 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
306e4
Core
Alder Lake-P
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
14/20
10 /20
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
459.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
7.26k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
6.9k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
2.77k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
2.55k (x0.19)
TOTAL
73.92k
19.48k (x0.26)

Multithread

i7-1280P

E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
180.2k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
191.43k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
80.22k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
7.46k (x0.48)
TOTAL
419.25k
459.31k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5351 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6087 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2976 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
560 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
14973 points/W
4835 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4741 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5251 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2632 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2776 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
15401 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4