| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i9-9900K


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-P
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.94k
5k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
20.22k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.27k
6.54k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
13.78k (x1.01)
TOTAL
50.27k
45.53k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
44.01k
36.39k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
125.05k
166.55k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76.28k
54.92k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
8.96k (x0.58)
TOTAL
260.85k
266.82k (x1.02)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
18.03k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.88k
25.98k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.75k
6.86k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
14.5k (x1.06)
TOTAL
73.05k
65.37k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
151.95k
131.34k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
160.95k
204.76k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.9k
55.74k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.91k
8.99k (x0.57)
TOTAL
413.72k
400.83k (x0.97)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
17.98k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
27.04k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
6.63k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
13.6k (x1.02)
TOTAL
73.92k
65.24k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
130.88k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
208.5k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
54.12k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
8.91k (x0.57)
TOTAL
419.25k
402.41k (x0.96)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
32.08k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
28.17k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
6.68k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
14.98k (x1.14)
TOTAL
91.45k
81.91k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
242.98k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
220.16k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
53.97k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
12.22k (x0.76)
TOTAL
468.3k
529.32k (x1.13)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4