| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i7-10750H


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1280P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.94k
4.69k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
18.71k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.27k
5.84k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
13.95k (x1.03)
TOTAL
50.27k
43.19k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
44.01k
18.79k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
125.05k
86.1k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76.28k
27.42k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
5.27k (x0.34)
TOTAL
260.85k
137.58k (x0.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
16.63k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
23.88k
24.17k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.75k
6.38k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
13.69k (x1)
TOTAL
73.05k
60.87k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
151.95k
67.07k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
160.95k
107.95k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.9k
27.05k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.91k
5.07k (x0.32)
TOTAL
413.72k
207.14k (x0.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
16.71k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
25.45k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
6.06k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
13.2k (x0.99)
TOTAL
73.92k
61.43k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
67.59k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
111.94k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
27.7k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
5.3k (x0.34)
TOTAL
419.25k
212.53k (x0.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
29.06k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
26.49k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
6.23k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
13.89k (x1.05)
TOTAL
91.45k
75.67k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
154.61k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
151.34k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
36.33k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
6.93k (x0.43)
TOTAL
468.3k
349.21k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4