Core i7-1280P vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.1 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.1 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-P
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
16.66k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
26.01k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
9.31k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
9.15k (x0.69)
TOTAL
91.45k
61.12k (x0.67)
Multithread
i7-1280P
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
144.48k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
192.46k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
83.17k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
7.51k (x0.47)
TOTAL
468.3k
427.61k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i7-1280P
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4